PDA

View Full Version : Honda's R&D Chief Says Automaker Prefers Fuel Cells to Batteries for EVs



AZEqualizer
09-15-2008, 11:00 PM
Green Car Advisors Senior Editor (http://blogs.edmunds.com/greencaradvisor/2008/09/hondas-rd-chief-says-automaker-prefers-fuel-cells-to-batteries-for-evs.html) opined last week that Honda was skipping at least the initial heat of the battery electric vehicle race to concentrate on its hybrid and fuel-cell electric programs.
----------

Honda believes fuel-cell electric cars such as its FCX Clarity will be marketable before battery-electric vehicles can make the grade.

----------
http://blogs.edmunds.com/greencaradvisor/assets_c/2008/07/2009HondaFCXClarity750-thumb-400x213.jpg

Now comes word, via Bloomberg News, that the automaker also is bowing out of the plug-in hybrid contest.
Batteries just aren't advanced enough to make rechargeable gasoline-electric vehicles sensible replacements for gasoline-only cars, Honda research chief Masaaki Kato said in a recent interview with the business news service.
"For battery-powered vehicles to become more widespread, more popular in the market, we feel battery technology needs to advance further,'' Kato said. "We just don't see it providing the type of driving performance you get with a gasoline-powered vehicle.''
Honda's reticence flys in the face of aggressive moves by General Motors Corp, with its promised Volt plug-in sedan (http://blogs.edmunds.com/greencaradvisor/2008/08/lutz-says-gm-will-have-production-version-volts-in-large-test-fleets-next-year.html), due in fleets in small numbers toward the end of next year and scheduled for mass production at the end of 2010, and Toyota Motor Corp., which is developing a plug-in Prius hybrid (http://blogs.edmunds.com/greencaradvisor/2008/09/toyota-launches-uk-testing-of-plug-in-prius-hybrids.html) for fleet use and has scheduled a late 2009 introduction (no word on when or if the car will be made available in the retail market).
Toyota and Nissan also are preparing small city-car EVs using rechargeable batteries.
The plug-ins rely on advanced lithium-ion batteries, which hold significantly more energy than the nickel-metal hydride batteries used in conventional, non-rechargeable hybrids and thus are able to provide more all-electric range without adding substantial weight to the vehicle.
GM says its Volt should be able to travel 40 miles with lithium-ion battery pack charged from the commercial grid before an onboard gasoline generator would kick in to keep the batteries charged.
But Kato told Bloomberg that Honda engineers don't believe lithium-ion batteries will satisfy most consumers because of their high cost and limited range compared to gasoline engines.
In Japan, he said, battery developers are still trying to meet a government goal of boosting energy storage capacity by seven times while slashing battery costs to just 2.5 percent of current costs.
"That gives you a pretty clear example of what type of gap we're facing relative to a gasoline vehicle,'' Kato said. "At this point, I'd say it's impossible to imagine a date at which such a breakthrough could occur.''
He said Honda believes it will be easier, less costly and quicker to perfect the fuel-cell electric vehicle, such as the FCX Clarity (http://blogs.edmunds.com/greencaradvisor/2008/07/honda-lanches-new-era-as-first-fcx-clarity-is-delivered.html) that it is leasing in small numbers to select consumers in Southern California and Japan.
The car uses compressed hydrogen gas that is mixed with oxygen in the onboard fuel-cell stack to produce the electricity that powers the drive motor. It has a range of 280 miles on a 4-kilogram tank of hydrogen, equivalent to about 70 miles per gallon in a gasoline-fueled car.
One big roadblock to successful introduction of fuel-cell vehicles is lack of a nationwide hydrogen fueling system -- but the battery-electric vehicle faces a similar obstacle.
While batteries can be recharged at home or at public charging stations, most such systems take several hours to replenish the power.
A national system of fast-charging stations that could let people "refill'' their EV batteries in 15 minutes or less is going to be necessary before most people will consider battery-electric vehicles to be all-purpose vehicles that can replace the gas cars in their garages.
John O'Dell, Senior Editor

Miracleman89
09-15-2008, 11:49 PM
This is because they own stock in oil industry, which are the same people developing hydrogen right now. So yes they prefer Fuel Cell! Wow what a shocker!!!

Mark Tomlinson
09-15-2008, 11:59 PM
I don't get it. I would have thought if Honda was going to abandon BEVs and PHEVs, they would have dumped fuel cells as well. Honda's core competency is engines. They consider themselves first an engine maker, second a car manufacturer. This is why you don't see Toyota generators and GM lawn equipment, but Honda's got thier name on all that stuff and more.

So my thought is that Honda would have advanced new engine designs, maybe getting into turbines or something. The fuel cell is dead end as far as I am concerned. And it's way outside of their core compentency.

RAN
09-16-2008, 01:00 AM
Agreed. Honda's taking careful aim at their foot with this development.

westonlgray
09-16-2008, 08:41 AM
I disagree. If you look at the cost of batteries, nobody is talking about putting them in affordable cars yet as plug-in hybrids. Hydrogen Fuel cells offer at least as much promise as batteries. Honda isn't saying they are against hybrid plug-ins, but they are saying that the battery efficiency/price are not in the range to make a standard electric only car evironmentally viable. No matter what kind of mileage a car gets, a $70,000 car has a lot more environmental impact than a $18,000 car. Just becasue the $70k car gets 90 MPG and the $18k gets 55MPG, the extra environmental impact on the $70k car is just hidden in the construction and materials manufacturing where you can't readily see it.

ziggy951
09-16-2008, 10:37 AM
I guess they have placed themselves firmly on the side of the "skeptical at best" EEstor crowd. Not that I hate Honda or anything, but I definitely hope this one comes back to bite them in the earhole. Although batteries arent there quite yet, I would think that within 5 years or so they should be ready for prime time, even if only half of the new tec makes it. Mass manufacture of some of the new stuff should help bring those EV/PHEV vehicle prices down.

Another problem is that they, everyone invloved, need to do a realistic approach to marketing EV's. Stop with the save the Planet crap. There are very few people in the US, the main market, that can afford to pay extra $$ just to show people they are green. The marketing needs to take aim at pocketbooks. A full ev that costs, for the sake of argument, $7,000USD more than its ICE counterpart needs to make that money up within a year or so, not 6-10 years.

Why the hell doesnt Honda focus on an extremely effecient engine to power a series electric car for crying out loud. That is what they have always been best at. There are plenty of options available for them to follow this route. They could probably take a small engine off the shelf, tune it, lighten it, make it pass emissions and have it ready by the end of 2009. They wouldnt need anything cutting edge for crying out loud. No regenerative braking, no solar, no hydrogen, no friggen Ipod holder. Basics like air conditioning, stereo, defrost, window wipers. Make it a price point that not only makes a good margin but also makes it available for mass market. People that are concerned most with MPG are willing to drive a stripped down Civic 4 door with a manual transmission. Run this car with a series system that gets 100mpg or more with similar performance specs to a low end ICE Civic and they would have a winner imo. I have probably over simplified this but its gotta make at least some sense.




Z

westonlgray
09-16-2008, 11:35 AM
I tend to disagree with you on this. By Honda supporting fuel cell technology, they are still developing all of the electrical systems that battery electric cars will use also.

As for battery price, Lithium and Nickel batteries have been mass produced for quite a while, and prices are still high. What is needed is more research which doesn't require production now. If they can develop a cheaper battery, it will be mass produced.

Honda is developing better engine technology. Look at the Insight. They designed a small engine that is only used for hybrid technology. They also got rid of the inefficiency of having two motors (generator and drive motor) by allowing the engine to free-wheel at very low losses when under electric only power. This should save resources as well as make the system cheaper.

All of their designs still contribute to more efficient electric vehicles, but they are not going to try to make a mass production econo-electric car that because of inadequate battery technologies would be priced beyond most peoples reach let alone trying to recoup the extra money by efficieny.

I would be in support of Honda developing a motorcycle type vehicle like the V1. Maybe they will...